Progress is not always a smooth or merry ride. For a few decades, nations live according to one paradigm. Then it stops working and gets destroyed. When the time comes to build a new paradigm, progressives talk about economic redistribution; conservatives talk about cultural and civic repair. History shows that you need both: Recovery from national crisis demands comprehensive reinvention at all levels of society. If you look back across the centuries, you find that this process requires several interconnected efforts. – David Brooks, I should have seen this coming
Chart for the VIX “Fear Index” showing the last three “once in a lifetime” financial crisis’
I learned this yesterday: Bonapartismis the term is more generally used for political movements that advocate for an authoritarian centralised state, with a strongman and charismatic leader, support for the military, and conservatism.
Add a description of explore/exploit, and how it is a dilemma for every living thing. Kauffman and Martindale describe the strategies that human beings have developed to apply explore/exploit to culture
Add something to the end that the role of good government is to take the best from explore and exploit, without causing convulsive, destructive change if possible.
SBIRs
Helped Ron get his papers
Tried to clean up all the ESDT paper cruft.
11:00 RTAT prep meeting – done
11:30 Meeting with John. Fixed all the basic bugs, I think?
AI TTRP meeting. Just some preliminary stuff Maybe take a course from MORS?
The study of connectivity and coordination has drawn increasing attention in recent decades due to their central role in driving markets, shaping societal dynamics, and influencing biological systems. Traditionally, observable connections, such as phone calls, financial transactions, or social media connections, have been used to infer coordination and connectivity. However, incomplete, encrypted, or fragmented data, alongside the ubiquity of communication platforms and deliberate obfuscation, often leave many real-world connections hidden. In this study, we demonstrate that coordinating individuals exhibit shared bursty activity patterns, enabling their detection even when observable links between them are sparse or entirely absent. We further propose a generative model based on the network of networks formalism to account for the mechanisms driving this collaborative burstiness, attributing it to shock propagation across networks rather than isolated individual behavior. Model simulations demonstrate that when observable connection density is below 70\%, burstiness significantly improves coordination detection compared to state-of-the-art temporal and structural methods. This work provides a new perspective on community and coordination dynamics, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical detection. By laying the foundation for identifying hidden connections beyond observable network structures, it enables detection across different platforms, alongside enhancing system behavior understanding, informed decision-making, and risk mitigation.
There is something in this for P33 – how simulation and legislation can support each other.
Tasks
TRP – done
SS – done
Fix vacuum – tried, but no good way to get to the AC cable.
Despite the remarkable successes of general-purpose neural networks, such as MLPs and Transformers, we find that they exhibit notable shortcomings in modeling and reasoning about periodic phenomena, achieving only marginal performance within the training domain and failing to generalize effectively to out-of-domain (OOD) scenarios. Periodicity is ubiquitous throughout nature and science. Therefore, neural networks should be equipped with the essential ability to model and handle periodicity. In this work, we propose FAN, a novel general-purpose neural network that offers broad applicability similar to MLP while effectively addressing periodicity modeling challenges. Periodicity is naturally integrated into FAN’s structure and computational processes by introducing the Fourier Principle. Unlike existing Fourier-based networks, which possess particular periodicity modeling abilities but are typically designed for specific tasks, our approach maintains the general-purpose modeling capability. Therefore, FAN can seamlessly replace MLP in various model architectures with fewer parameters and FLOPs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the superiority of FAN in periodicity modeling tasks and the effectiveness and generalizability of FAN across a range of real-world tasks, e.g., symbolic formula representation, time series forecasting, language modeling, and image recognition.
SBIRs
Looks like I’m stunt Aaron on and off for a while. Not sure if he will be in today
This is a nice representation of how a transformer encoder works (from CSAIL – MIT):
Had some fun with Midjourney today:
Tasks
Maybe got recurring payments set up?
GPT Agents
Work more on psychology/sociology in P33. I’m beginning to realize that P33 is an oppositional document to Curtis Yarvin‘s work. Tech egalitarianism as opposed to tech monarchy. This may matter, actually. Will need to do some reading.
Continue to look for the quote about avoiding the risk of the new for the safety of the status quo
SBIRs
11:00 Sizing and timing. Regen files so that there are a fixed number of test cases – nope
12:30 Drone? RTAT? meeting – done and very pointless
3:00 Performance management employee training – could have been 20 minutes
I learned about two absolutely crazy things today. This is profoundly bad communications security at the very least. If I had done this, I would almost certainly be in jail.
With a minimum amount of coaxing, this is what Llama3 (rt-1776) came up with as a potential scenario with follow on effects. So this particular scenario could easily have been wargamed by, for example, China using commercially available models. And you can download Llama’s weights and serve it yourself, so no records of any kind:
Coax the Public Release of CIA Hiring Data to Compromise U.S. Intelligence (Black Operation)
Method: Use infiltrated intermediaries (e.g., compromised congressional staffers, lobbyists, or sympathetic media figures) to subtly encourage hardline White House advisers to demand the CIA produce an unclassified, publicly releasable list of all employees hired in the last two years—framed as “draining the deep state” or auditing DEI-linked hires. Then, leak the document through proxy servers to hostile foreign intelligence platforms or conspiracy outlets like WikiLeaks clones.
Rationale:
Exposure of Operatives: Even if names are redacted, unclassified metadata (e.g., hiring dates, locations, departments) could help adversaries like China cross-reference identities with other leaks, travel patterns, or diplomatic postings to unmask CIA officers, analysts, or assets.
Institutional Paranoia: Force the CIA to resist the White House, exacerbating executive-intelligence community tensions. This could lead to retaliatory firings, morale collapse, or rushed reforms that degrade operational security.
Global Embarrassment: The release would signal U.S. administrative incompetence, emboldening rivals to aggressively target exposed personnel. Allies might also withhold intelligence-sharing over perceived insecurity.
Domestic Polarization: Far-right media would weaponize the list to allege “deep state” hiring biases, while progressives would condemn the administration for endangering civil servants. This distracts from policy agendas and deepens distrust in institutions.
Plausible Deniability: China could mask its role by routing the leak through cutouts (e.g., hacktivist groups, Russian-aligned networks), ensuring blowback focuses on the White House’s poor judgment rather than foreign interference.
Key Vulnerabilities Exploited:
The administration’s hostility toward federal agencies and desire to publicly humiliate perceived opponents.
Overconfidence in executive power to compel compliance from apolitical institutions.
Culture war narratives that prioritize “stigmatizing DEI” over protecting national security equities.
Outcome: The White House appears reckless for mishandling sensitive personnel data, while U.S. intelligence capabilities suffer long-term damage from compromised officers and bureaucratic infighting.
And in less crazy things that are worth knowing:
Tasks
F/TRP after 9:30 – done
KP bill
Added some text from my BlueSky blog post to the P33 piece on psychology/sociology. Maybe parts from the Great Chain of Being post and the Grit post? Something to visualize disruption and place it into the current context.
SBIRs
Sizing and timing run for Aaron? Regardless, generate a bunch of runs and send the files with a description of what’s in them – done. We’ll meet daily to evaluate and generate the next set of data
viztales 
You must be logged in to post a comment.