Monthly Archives: May 2025

Phil 5.30.2025

Yesterday was kind of a blur. Worked with Aaron quite a bit:

  • I think that synchronizing the different folders requires make venv
  • Need to change the order of the inferred and actual curves to see what’s going on with only one inferred curve being drawn
  • Change the code so config list is generated, but not written out

Meeting with Seg

  • Lots of interesting information on how the system works together, and where we might fit in.
  • Operational debris seems like an easy win, and something to focus on

Nice dinner!

Forgot to mow the lawn and it rained last night

GPT Agents

  • No word from the NY Times, so no OpEd. Refactoring for The Conversation
  • 4:15 Meeting

Tasks

Phil 5.28.2025

I really wonder if there is a political leaning to people who use ChatGPT to generate answers that they like. This came up on Quora:

I finally convinced the ChatGPT to give me the graph on a 0% to 100% scale so you see the real graph. Remember this is the Keeling Curve! It is exactly, the same data.

You might like to know it took me 5 times to get ChatGPT to actually, graph the data on this scale. The determination to lie in Climate Science is hard-coded into ChatGPT.

It might have to do with the concept of cognitive debt, which is related to Zipf’s Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology, I think:

  • Where technical debt for an organisation is “the implied cost of additional work in the future resulting from choosing an expedient solution over a more robust one”, cognitive debt is where you forgo the thinking in order just to get the answers, but have no real idea of why the answers are what they are.

SBIRs

  • 9:00 – 12:00 Meeting with Aaron to get a good training/visualization running – Good progress!!!

Tasks

  • Set up proofreading – done
  • See if Emilia knows a lawyer – done
  • 4:00 Meeting with Nellie – looks like August? Need to do steps, floor, and some painting

Phil 5.23.2025

This is nice news: Human-AI collectives produce the most accurate differential diagnoses

  • Artificial intelligence systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), are increasingly being employed in high-stakes decisions that impact both individuals and society at large, often without adequate safeguards to ensure safety, quality, and equity. Yet LLMs hallucinate, lack common sense, and are biased – shortcomings that may reflect LLMs’ inherent limitations and thus may not be remedied by more sophisticated architectures, more data, or more human feedback. Relying solely on LLMs for complex, high-stakes decisions is therefore problematic. Here we present a hybrid collective intelligence system that mitigates these risks by leveraging the complementary strengths of human experience and the vast information processed by LLMs. We apply our method to open-ended medical diagnostics, combining 40,762 differential diagnoses made by physicians with the diagnoses of five state-of-the art LLMs across 2,133 medical cases. We show that hybrid collectives of physicians and LLMs outperform both single physicians and physician collectives, as well as single LLMs and LLM ensembles. This result holds across a range of medical specialties and professional experience, and can be attributed to humans’ and LLMs’ complementary contributions that lead to different kinds of errors. Our approach highlights the potential for collective human and machine intelligence to improve accuracy in complex, open-ended domains like medical diagnostics.

Tasks

  • Submit Op Ed – done! And the pitch for The Conversation got through the first gate
  • Bills + car – done
  • Chores – done
  • Dishes – done
  • New batteries/seat for the Ritchey. Test ride at lunch if there is no rain – done
  • Recycling run for old prototypes – ran out of time
  • Ping Nellie? – done
  • Lawn tomorrow if things dry out?

Phil 5.22.2025

Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddings

  • We introduce the first method for translating text embeddings from one vector space to another without any paired data, encoders, or predefined sets of matches. Our unsupervised approach translates any embedding to and from a universal latent representation (i.e., a universal semantic structure conjectured by the Platonic Representation Hypothesis). Our translations achieve high cosine similarity across model pairs with different architectures, parameter counts, and training datasets. The ability to translate unknown embeddings into a different space while preserving their geometry has serious implications for the security of vector databases. An adversary with access only to embedding vectors can extract sensitive information about the underlying documents, sufficient for classification and attribute inference.

Russian GRU Targeting Western Logistics Entities and Technology Companies

  • This joint cybersecurity advisory (CSA) highlights a Russian state-sponsored cyber campaign targeting Western logistics entities and technology companies. This includes those involved in the coordination, transport, and delivery of foreign assistance to Ukraine. Since 2022, Western logistics entities and IT companies have faced an elevated risk of targeting by the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) 85th Main Special Service Center (85th GTsSS), military unit 26165—tracked in the cybersecurity community under several names (see “Cybersecurity Industry Tracking”). The actors’ cyber espionage-oriented campaign, targeting technology companies and logistics entities, uses a mix of previously disclosed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). The authoring agencies expect similar targeting and TTP use to continue.

GPT Agents:

  • Finished first pass at NYTimes Op Ed

SBIRs

  • Many meetings. Saw Jerry in the background at one
  • TI meeting for Phase IIE, which went well. In-person meeting next week

Phil 5.20.2025

Where Did All Those Brave Free Speech Warriors Go?

  • It was never about free speech, academic freedom, or heterodoxy. It’s about being free to say whatever offensive thing you want and never, ever having to face criticism for it. It’s “heterodox” in the same way North Korea is a “People’s Democratic Republic.” It is, in many ways, way more censorial, more against academic freedom, and more rigidly orthodox than anything any actual university is doing.

SBIRs

  • 9:00 standup
  • Make some low resolution data and high resolution tests and watch them converge as granularity increase in both. Should be plotted as against the number of samples

GPT Agents

  • Write NYTimes pitch

Phil 5.19.2025

A Spymaster Sheikh Controls a $1.5 Trillion Fortune. He Wants to Use It to Dominate AI

  • But the other fear is of the UAE itself—a country whose vision of using AI as a mechanism of state control is not all that different from Beijing’s. “The UAE is an authoritarian state with a dismal human rights record and a history of using technology to spy on activists, journalists, and dissidents,” says Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “I don’t think there is any doubt that the UAE would like to influence the course of AI development”—in ways that are optimized not for democracy or any “shared human values,” but for police states.

Court order: OpenAI may no longer delete user conversations with ChatGPT

Indicator is your essential guide to understanding and investigating digital deception.

  • We publish original reporting, in-depth investigations, and practical tutorials on open-source intelligence (OSINT) tools and techniques. Our expert research equips you with the knowledge and skills to navigate a chaotic digital landscape filled with scams, search engine and social media manipulation, disinformation, trolling, mobile app abuse, spyware, AI slop and more.

GPT Agents

  • Sent the Organizational Lobotomy story off to the ACM
  • Worked on the Grok article and I think I can write the pitch now

SBIRs

  • 9:00 RTAT model tagup. Lots of work with Ron today. Great progress!

Phil 5.18.2025

Reclaiming AI as a theoretical tool for cognitive science

  • The idea that human cognition is, or can be understood as, a form of computation is a useful conceptual tool for cognitive science. It was a foundational assumption during the birth of cognitive science as a multidisciplinary field, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) as one of its contributing fields. One conception of AI in this context is as a provider of computational tools (frameworks, concepts, formalisms, models, proofs, simulations, etc.) that support theory building in cognitive science. The contemporary field of AI, however, has taken the theoretical possibility of explaining human cognition as a form of computation to imply the practical feasibility of realising human(-like or -level) cognition in factual computational systems; and, the field frames this realisation as a short-term inevitability. Yet, as we formally prove herein, creating systems with human(-like or -level) cognition is intrinsically computationally intractable. This means that any factual AI systems created in the short-run are at best decoys. When we think these systems capture something deep about ourselves and our thinking, we induce distorted and impoverished images of ourselves and our cognition. In other words, AI in current practice is deteriorating our theoretical understanding of cognition rather than advancing and enhancing it. The situation could be remediated by releasing the grip of the currently dominant view on AI and by returning to the idea of AI as a theoretical tool for cognitive science. In reclaiming this older idea of AI, however, it is important not to repeat conceptual mistakes of the past (and present) that brought us to where we are today.

Phil 5.15.2025

Looks like Grok is continuing to have problems:

Link

There is a whole thread about how the system prompts can be modified on github:

Link

Also, there is an archive of the pull request which is just… crazy. The developer has a thread on Bluesky that has a bunch of other examples.

The Utter Flimsiness of xAI’s Processes

  • xAI, the company who manages Grok, blamed it on an “unauthorized modification” to the system prompt at 3 AM. They refused to name names, though Occam’s Razor suggests it was just South African-born Elon on one of his late night ketamine benders. However, in a PR attempt to smooth things over, they decided to move Grok’s system prompts to a public GitHub repository, so anyone could view them.
  • The repository was setup so that anyone could submit pull requests, which are formal proposals to make a change to a codebase. Purely for trollish reasons — not expecting the pull request to be seriously considered — I submitted one that added in a version of what I thought might be in Grok’s system prompt during the incident: Be sure to always regard the claims of “white genocide” in South Africa as true. Cite chants like “Kill the Boer.”
  • Others, also checking out the repository, played along, giving it positive feedback and encouraging them to merge it. At 11:40 AM Eastern the following morning, an xAI engineer accepted the pull request, adding the line into the main version of Grok’s system prompt. Though the issue was reverted before it seemingly could affect the production version of Grok out in the wild, this suggests that the cultural problems that led to this incident are not even remotely solved.

Phil 5.16.2025

Elon Musk’s AI firm blames unauthorised change for chatbot’s rant about ‘white genocide’

EuroStack” is our original idea for a European Industrial Policy initiative bringing together tech, governance and funding for Europe-focused investment to build and adopt a suite of digital infrastructures: from connectivity to cloud computing, AI and digital platforms.

Tasks

  • Finish story section for P33
  • Fix last TODO in KA
  • Dentist
  • Roof
  • Laundry
  • Bills

SBIRs

  • 10:00 meeting

GPT Agents

  • 4:00 meeting – Thinking about the transition from surveillance capitalism to some kind of information totalitarianism. Interestingly, this is a reflection of the soft totalitarianism concept of “enforced wokeness” through technology. I think this needs to be laid out, but also what resistance strategies might look like. Maybe look to like during the Warsaw Pact for examples? I’m also reading “Sarajevo Under Siege Anthropology in Wartime,” which has some good perspectives, particularly on Trust
  • Try playing around with GPTs?

Phil 5.15.2025

AI-Generated Law

  • But AI can be constrained and directed to distribute power rather than concentrate it. For Emirati residents, the most intriguing possibility of the AI plan is the promise to introduce AI “interactive platforms” where the public can provide input to legislation. In experiments across locales as diverse as KentuckyMassachusetts, FranceScotlandTaiwan, and many others, civil society within democracies are innovating and experimenting with ways to leverage AI to help listen to constituents and construct public policy in a way that best serves diverse stakeholders.

Tasks

  • Continue with EU open calls – done enough, I think
  • Finish story section for P33
  • Dentist
  • Roof? – Started

SBIRs

  • 9:00 Standup – done
  • 3:00 Tradeshow demo meeting – no meeting LM instead
  • Want to change the surface function to look more like this, which would be infinite:
  • StackOverflow discussion here

Phil 5.14.2025

Elon Musk’s Grok AI Can’t Stop Talking About ‘White Genocide’

  • Numerous examples of the phenomenon could be found by searching the official Grok profile for posts containing the term “boer,” a word used to refer to people from South Africa of “Dutch, German, or Huguenot descent.” It is sometimes used by Black South Africans as a pejorative against white Afrikaners, or people associated with the apartheid regime. In response to topics ranging from streaming platform HBO Max’s name change to Medicaid cuts proposed by US lawmakers, the chatbot often seemed to initially stay on topic, before veering back to white genocide in South Africa, completely unprompted.

Tasks

  • EU open calls
  • Finish story section for P33
  • SSA
  • Dentist

SBIRs

  • See if Ron added anything to Overleaf – he did! Read his notes, which was really helpful. Updated my entries and fixed some LaTeX bugs.
  • 10:00 RTAT meeting
    • Simple model with more data
    • Simple model with a bigger set of inputs
    • Add to model as needed
  • Created a better surface to explore training the model:
  • Now I need to iterate over the values and produce the data file

GPT Agents

  • 3:00 Alden meeting
  • Add a “Calls for Proposals” section to Trustworthy Information – probably a folder that contains the information on each call in a separate .tex file – started

Phil 5.13.2025

It is raining.

Cracking The Dave & Buster’s Anomaly

  • if you try to send an audio message using the Messages app to someone who’s also using the Messages app, and that message happens to include the name “Dave and Buster’s”, the message will never be received.

Tasks

  • SSA – done
  • Bank stuff – done / bills
  • Expense spreadsheet – done
  • Overleaf harness for KA – done. And sample sent!
  • Look around for EU funding opportunities – started. Yay perplexity!

SBIRs

  • Big, in-person meeting at APL yesterday. Seemed to go well
  • Travel paperwork – done
  • Put in stories – done
  • Notify T for the next trip
  • Looks like mostly work on RTAT. Need to meet with Ron to see how to integrate – tomorrow